You read about the CSF Profile Assessment Database getting listed on NIST.gov. You thought, "That's cool, I should contribute." Then you looked at the GitHub page and froze.

If the gap between "I want to contribute" and "I know how to contribute" feels like a canyon, this post is your bridge. No coding experience required. No special tools. Just a willingness to learn and a few hours of focused effort.

Pre-requisite: Install the App

Follow the steps in the README and watch the pointy clicky installation video. Don’t hesitate to let me know if you have any questions in a YouTube comment, on Simply Cyber Discord, or subscribe to the blog to get my email address.

Your First Contribution: No Coding Required

The community doesn't just need developers writing apps. It needs GRC practitioners documenting controls, writing test procedures, and creating implementation guides.

The most valuable contributions right now are case study content - the kind of work GRC analysts do every day: test procedures, sample artifacts, control documentation, and implementation examples.

Let me walk you through exactly how to make your first contribution.

Step 1: Pick a "Good First Issue"

Go to the GitHub Issues page and look for issues labeled "good first issue". These are specifically designed for newcomers.Here's one to start with:

Issue #43: DE.AE - Adverse Event Analysis

This means: document how an organization would test whether they're effectively detecting, analyzing, and responding to suspicious events and potential security incidents.

Other good first issues include:

  • Issue #44: DE.CM - Continuous Monitoring

  • Issue #45: RS.AN - Incident Analysis

Step 2: Understand What You're Contributing

For Issue #43 (DE.AE), you're helping document how to assess an organization's adverse event analysis capabilities. The issue includes rich context from our fictional case study company, Alma Security Business Case and Sample Artifacts

  • Real metrics: TTD (Time to Detect) improved from 81 hours to 7 hours

  • Real tools: CloudTrail, VPC Flow Logs, DNS query logging, Amazon GuardDuty

  • Real gaps: No 24/7 monitoring, inconsistent log retention (7-30 days)

  • Real incidents: SOC tickets 1001, 1004, 1005

Think of your contribution as the checklist a GRC analyst would use during an assessment of the DETECT function. You're answering three questions:

  • What should be tested? - Are monitoring tools configured correctly? Are detection rules effective? Is log collection centralized?

  • How would you test it? - Review SIEM dashboards, assess correlation rules, measure TTD metrics, verify alert triage procedures

  • What artifacts prove it? - GuardDuty configurations, SIEM screenshots, TTD trend reports, sample incident analysis records

Think of it like this: you're creating the checklist a GRC analyst would use during an assessment of the DETECT function.

Step 3: Comment on the Issue

You don't need to submit a pull request to contribute. Start by commenting on the issue with your ideas.

Example comment:

I'd like to contribute test steps for DE.AE-02 (Analyze Potentially Adverse Events). Here's what I'm thinking:

Test Procedure:

  1. Review SIEM/log analysis tool configuration for event correlation rules

  2. Verify CloudTrail and VPC Flow Logs are feeding into centralized analysis

  3. Sample 3-5 GuardDuty alerts and trace the analysis workflow

  4. Compare TTD metrics against baseline (Alma's improved from 81 to 7 hours)

Sample Artifacts:

  • GuardDuty finding configuration screenshots

  • SIEM correlation rule documentation

  • TTD metrics dashboard (Q1/Q2 2026 comparison)

  • Sample analysis from SOC ticket 1004

I noticed the issue mentions gaps in 24/7 coverage — should I document that as a finding?

That's it. You've just contributed.

Step 4: Iterate Based on Feedback

I’ll respond. I might ask for clarification, suggest additions, or say "looks great, let's add it."

This back-and-forth is how open source works. You're not expected to get it perfect on the first try.

For Contributors With Technical Skills

If you do have coding chops or security testing experience, there's plenty of work:

Current Focus Areas:

  • Atlassian Integration - Connecting the tool to Jira and Confluence for teams already using those platforms

  • AI Chatbot Feature - Running local LLMs (Ollama) with Ethan Troy's NIST training dataset - 523,000 training examples from 568 NIST publications

  • Security Hardening - Issues #71-76 address credential handling and input validation

  • Desktop Application - Issue #70 tracks migrating to Tauri for enterprise deployment

Check the full issues list and comment on anything that matches your skills.

The GitHub Learning Curve (It's Smaller Than You Think)

Never used GitHub? Here's the minimum you need to know:

  1. Create a free account at github.com

  2. Navigate to the repository - github.com/CPAtoCybersecurity/csf_profile

  3. Click on "Issues" - This is where work gets tracked

  4. Comment on an issue - Share your ideas, ask questions, offer help

That's genuinely all you need to start contributing. You don't need to understand branches, pull requests, or merge conflicts. Those come later, if you want them.

What Happens After You Contribute

When your contribution gets merged (added to the project), your GitHub username goes on the contributors list. That's the link you put on your resume.

But more importantly, you've now:

  • Worked through a real CSF subcategory

  • Thought about what "good" looks like for that control

  • Documented your reasoning in a way others can follow

That's the work. That's what hiring managers want to see.

Pro Tips for Standing Out

👉 Pro Tip: Don't just contribute content — ask thoughtful questions. "Should the TTD test procedure account for business hours vs. 24/7 coverage gaps?" shows you're thinking critically about Alma's real constraints.

👉 Pro Tip: Reference NIST guidance in your contributions. Link to specific CSF 2.0 subcategories (DE.AE-01 through DE.AE-07). It shows you did the research.

👉 Pro Tip: Volunteer for multiple issues in the same function. Becoming the go-to person for "DETECT" controls (DE.AE, DE.CM) is more valuable than scattered one-offs across different functions.

Ready to Level Up? The Fork & Pull Request Workflow

Once you're comfortable commenting, here's how to submit changes directly:

  1. Fork the repository (creates your own copy)

  2. Edit files in your fork (add your test procedures, artifacts)

  3. Submit a Pull Request (proposes your changes to the main project)

This is how your name ends up in the official contributors list.

Don't worry about this for your first contribution - commenting works great. But when you're ready, GitHub's "First Contributions" guide walks through the process step-by-step.

Get Started Today

Here's your action plan:

  1. Read the first blog to understand the tool: A Practitioner's Tool for Implementing CSF

  2. Create a GitHub account (if you don't have one)

  3. Pick Issue an issue like #43 - DE.AE Adverse Event Analysis

  4. Comment with your ideas - Test steps for monitoring tools, detection artifacts, TTD metrics

  5. Join the Simply Cyber Discord to connect with other contributors

Don't overthink it. Don't wait until you feel "ready." The best way to learn GRC is by doing GRC.

Please don't be shy in asking questions. I'll see you in the Simply Cyber community.

📚 NIST's Official Resources Page: CSF 2.0 Community Resources

Want to build a stronger GRC foundation before contributing? Check out the Certified Cyber Resilience Fundamentals at Simply Cyber Academy, or start with the free How to Break Into GRC if you're still exploring the field.

Keep Reading